The U.S. economy is now so addicted to the Fed’s monthly $85 billion injection of monetary stimulus … that just the thought of withdrawal is enough to cause violent market convulsions.
Consider, for example, the absurdity of this recent chain of events:
* The U.S. Labor Department announces a far better-than-expected report on new jobs …
* Investors fear that the good economic news may nudge the Fed a tad closer to cutting back its stimulus …
* They dump their investments by the truckload, and …
* Bond prices plunge the most in four months, driving interest rates skyward.
All in response to supposedly good news about the economy!
All because investors would rather see the economy sink than see the Fed cut back on its monthly megadose of money shot up their veins.
Or consider the long sequence of excuses Fed Chairman Bernanke has offered for smashing the 100-year Fed prohibition against running the money printing presses 24/7 …
First, he said they had no choice because of the great debt crisis of 2008.
“Unless we flood the banking system with money,” went the argument, “megabanks will fail and global financial markets will collapse in a heap of rubble.”
Second, as soon as the worst of the debt crisis was apparently behind us, they promptly came up with a brand new rationale: Trillion-dollar federal budget deficits year after year.
“Unless we buy Treasuries by the truckload,” they reasoned, “the deficits will smash the bond markets and sabotage the economic recovery.”
Next in the long line-up of excuses came the European debt crisis, the Fiscal Cliff and, most recently, the government shutdown.
Each time, the Fed kept the pedal to the metal on its giant money presses. And each time, there was a new crisis to justify their reckless DUI.
Yellen takes the cake …
In the Forked Tongue category,new Fed chief Janet Yellen has now eclipsed Fed Chairman Bernanke for the first prize.
In her testimony before Congress last week, she says little or nothing about the 2008 debt crisis, federal deficits, European debacles, fiscal cliffs or any others which were among her predecessor’s favorite excuses for the unprecedented money printing she vows to pursue.
Nor does she talk much about a weak economy.
Instead, her new rationale is that, although the economy has improved, it hasn’t quite improved “enough.”
The end result of this kind of thinking is a dangerous growth in the supply of money.
Consider these facts- Fact #1. Immediately prior to the Lehman Brothers failure, the Fed reports that the monetary base stood at $849.8 billion.
This past October 30, it was $3,607.7 billion. That’s an expansion of $2,757.8 billion — over $2.7 trillion.
Fact #2. This $2.7 trillion expansion has all taken place within just six years and one month.
If, instead, the Fed had continued to expand the monetary base at a normal pace (by the same amount as it had since 1961), it would have taken nearly 150 years to come this far. In other words …
With normal growth, the Fed’s recent $2.7 trillion monetary expansion would not have been achieved until the year 2158!
Fact #3. Prior to 2008, there were only two times the Fed embarked on extremely rapid monetary explosion of this type — first in anticipation of the widely feared Y2K bug; and later, in the aftermath of the 9-11 terrorist attacks. But as of the latest tally, the post-Lehman QEs have been
• a whopping 43 times larger than the dramatic Y2K expansion, and …
• an unbelievable 69.5 times larger than the Fed’s explosive reaction to 9/11.